Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | Home RSS
 
 
 

NRA: No Chance For New Gun Ban

Group says there’s enough opposition in Congress to new law

January 14, 2013

WASHINGTON (AP) — The National Rifle Association says it has enough support in Congress to block a law that would ban assault weapons, despite promises from the White House to make such a measure a......

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(63)

daWraith

Jan-16-13 8:02 PM

Cluela&& is a on STUPID roll, keep 'em coming, dumba&&..

BUZZZZ! WRONG!!!!!!

"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms.

History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so. Indeed I would go so far as to say that the underdog is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty.

So let’s not have any native militia or police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order.

----Adolph Hitler, April 11, 1942, in “Hitler’s Table- Talk at the Fuehrer’s Headquarters 1941-1942”, Dr. Henry Picker, ed. (Athenaeum Verlag, Bonn, 1951) "

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-16-13 4:48 PM

Some likes you are describing your family, Fido1758. Heee HAW!

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GETACLUE

Jan-16-13 3:59 PM

"That is what ADOLPH HITLER implemented."....... UHHHHH WROMG!!! Hitler never banned guns this is just made up revisionist history.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-16-13 2:03 PM

rover “swishy 'in the closet' head of the NRA”

rover “untermenschen”

From Wikipedia “Untermensch (German for under man, sub-man, sub-human; plural: Untermenschen) is a term that became infamous when the Nazi racial ideology used it to describe "inferior people", especially "the masses from the East," that is Gypsies, Jews, and Slavic peoples including Belarusians, Poles, Russians and Ukrainians, although many of the Slavs were accepted as Aryans.”

I thought you libbies were the “tolerant” ones. If you progressives continue to gain seats in Congress maybe we conservatives should move to ban gas ovens.

(ker splank) LOL

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

rover1958

Jan-16-13 12:32 PM

duhWrat's ravings continue to appeal to ONLY his constituency of tobaccey chewing-spitting, uneducated, *******, trailer-trash, pseudo-macho untermenschen.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

rover1958

Jan-16-13 12:08 PM

The NRA used to be just a 'Markmanship' club. But over the years has become full of themselves. Want to dictate their nutty arms industry patter to the majority of educated and sane citizens.

So, 'no chance' eh? Watch Obama/Biden for their take on what needs to be done. They count. The swishy 'in the closet' head of the NRA will LOSE again!

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-16-13 11:00 AM

acoustic, you forgot to call ‘em racist, terbackee-spittin’ moonshiners, too. Yeeee hawwww everybody...(ker splank) LOL

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

acousticportal

Jan-16-13 8:40 AM

What a bunch of idiots.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-16-13 6:37 AM

Big talk from a washed-up geriatric has-been in Smallville, Fido1858.

I don't need to kill "old fools"; you idiots fall on your a&& and croak daily in dying OV.

Its called "Obituary" page, fool.

0 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-16-13 6:35 AM

IDIOTS! The Supreme Court already ruled in "Heller versus DC" that a WELL REGULATED MILITIA was simply EVERY Citizen of the United States.

That is ESTABLISHED LAW for years.

Give up on this bull**** that only the "military" should have guns.

That is what ADOLPH HITLER implemented. HOW did that work out for 6 million J*ws???

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

rover1958

Jan-16-13 3:34 AM

@walksabout: rover. what does it matter what words are in the constitution if law makers ignore duty to uphold them ?

That's why there is 'Constitutional Law' and lawyers who specialize in such. And that is why the Supreme Court hears these cases. The 'Constitution' is a living document that is constantly under review and interpretation. Just ask 'Dred Scott'.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

icecream

Jan-16-13 1:27 AM

LoriAA;

So YOU are part of a WELL REGULATED MILITIA AS THE 2ND AMENDMENT STATES IS THE PURPOSE OF GUN OWNERSHIP???

GET REAL...WELL REGULATED MILITIA!!! 2ND AMENDMENT

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

icecream

Jan-16-13 1:23 AM

rover 1958,

You stated my opinions very well...

Thank you!

No one is taking anyone's guns away!!!

The primary issue is to enforce the laws we already have on the books and reinstate laws that have been allowed to expire..

Better background checks? Who can say this is bad??? If it will help keep guns out of the hands of lunatics...

That's what some politics are saying--it's the mentally ill people, well a more thorough background check may help!!

No single law will stop this chaos entirely!!! But it the first step..

Then we can deal with the mentally ill people in different legislation...

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

walksabout

Jan-16-13 12:30 AM

anybody heard the price the lawmakers plan to pay you for your semi autos and big clips ?

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

walksabout

Jan-16-13 12:28 AM

if you kill the intruder wiyh first shot, what harm is another 20 or so hits ? You may need all 20. I have no business demanding my neighbor is limited to just so many chances to preserve his life against intruder.

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

walksabout

Jan-16-13 12:26 AM

next. executive decision to set all highway spped limits at 60 and ban vehicles capable of speeds greater than 6omph. The physical damage at 120 mph crash can be anticipated greater than 1 to 60 mph.

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

rover1958

Jan-15-13 8:35 PM

'ole duhRAT loves to talk shiet about guns as he dreams of some poor old fool he can kill and not go to jail for it. But the two professions where he would have a chance to be a 'gunman' (law enforcement and military) he sped, faster than a speeding bullet, away from.

Probably had automatic repeater action from his 'tail gun' of the big brown 'bullets' as he hightailed it away from a REAL confrontation.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-15-13 8:15 PM

ANYBODY who says a homeowner does NOT need a high capacity semiauto weapon for home defense is completely full of Scat!

Statistic show that TRAINED firearms experts like POLICE and military hit about 3 out of every TEN shots in a tense close range shooting incident.

This is not like waiting hours to shoot an unarmed deer who wanders into your blind or a sniper from 300 yeards who has scoped in a target.

The TARGET is SHOOTING at YOU and MOVING and YOU are scared SPITLESS!!

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-15-13 8:11 PM

1/4/2013:

"Why do we need multiple shot weapons???

"

A woman in Loganville, GA saw someone trying to break into her home during the day on Friday.

The woman quickly grabbed her two kids and her .38 revolver and hid in a crawl space.

Despite hiding, the would be intruder still found the family and the woman was forced to open fire on the suspect.

She fired all six shots from her gun and hit the suspect 5 times.

The woman tried to hold the intruder at gunpoint, BUT HE FLED THE SCENE IN HIS CAR"!!!!!!!

However, the intruder was badly injured and crashed his car nearby where he was apprehended by police.

The suspect was taken to an area hospital for treatment.

The suspect has a criminal record and was most recently released from jail in August."

DUH!

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

daWraith

Jan-15-13 8:01 PM

Rover1858, thanks for proving you are 200 years old! It has become VERY difficult to amend the constitution.

The 27th and LAST amendment was passed more then TWENTY YEARS ago.

The 26th was passed 42 years ago.

If you "saw" 6 amendments you have to be at least 72 years old to make you 10 when the when it passed. To see 7 amendments in your lifetime would require you to be 90 years old.

What else would we expect from a Smallville podunk BS artist?

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

walksabout

Jan-15-13 5:17 PM

rover. what does it matter what words are in the constitution if law makers ignore duty to uphold them ?

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

walksabout

Jan-15-13 5:11 PM

so many countries lost their freedoms because they first lost means to defend themselves when things came sneaking around their lands.They didn't know at the time that so called trial baloons would grow so big as to blot out the sunshine.

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

rover1958

Jan-15-13 5:07 PM

lori said, ".. think he can change the U.S Contitution that was written over 200 years ago....

Well Lori, the Constitution can be changed and has been changed over the years 27 times. That is called 'amending the Constitution'. It's difficult to do but can be done. Been done six times in my own lifetime.

I don't think there is any plan whatsoever to outlaw ownership of guns and no plans for amending the constitution for that. What is wanted, needed, and WiLL happen will be a regulated requirement to try, just try, to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, former criminals, the insane and people who have convictions or arrests for incidence of instability and threats to others.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-15-13 2:32 PM

Don’t worry, acoustic. After conservatives take back America we’ll still share the freedom with you. You’ll have to start carrying your own weight when it comes to putting food on your table, a roof over your head, and a cell phone in your ear, though. Ker splank [as the tobacceee hits the spittoon] LOL

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TrollSlayer

Jan-15-13 2:26 PM

You had a point? Besides claiming all gun show attendees are idiots and racists and all gun owners are tobaccy-spittin' moonshine brewin' red necks, I mean? LOL

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 63 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

EZToUse.com

I am looking for: